COURT DISMISSES KEN OFORI-ATTA’S BID TO BLOCK ‘WANTED’ NOTICE BY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

 By : SAMUEL OPOKU JUNE 22, 2025

  

    Sources: Peace FM Online
    

1. Does the image accurately represent the headline's message?

Yes. The image features Ken Ofori-Atta (left) and Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng (right), the two central figures in the headline and legal proceedings. The juxtaposition directly aligns with the story’s conflict Ofori-Atta's legal challenge against the Special Prosecutor's move.

2. What emotions does the image evoke?

Ken Ofori-Atta’s contemplative, possibly defensive expression suggests stress or calculation typical of legal scrutiny, while Kissi Agyebeng’s calm, confident demeanor embodies authority and resolve. Their contrasting appearances subtly highlight the tension and conflict between law enforcement and the accused.

3. Is the image manipulated or biased? (Does it frame the story in a particular way?)

The image shows no strong manipulation but features subtle editorial framing. Its side-by-side layout encourages viewers to compare the two figures, hinting at confrontation. Ofori-Atta’s hand-on-chin pose adds thoughtful or troubled nuance, while the formal presentation of both men maintains dignity and neutrality without overt bias.

4. How does composition affect storytelling?

The equal split framing presents Ken Ofori-Atta and Kissi Agyebeng as equally important, emphasizing their central roles in the conflict. Balanced lighting highlights Ofori-Atta against a warm tone and Agyebeng against a neutral background, subtly contrasting emotion with impartiality. The sharp, centered focus on their faces makes the image character-driven, reinforcing the narrative of a legal battle between two powerful figures.

5. Does the image add depth to the story or simply reinforce the headline?

It adds depth.
By presenting both individuals involved, it allows the viewer to see not just the facts but the human elements  authority versus accusation, persistence versus pressure. It visualizes the tension rather than just repeating the headline.

6. Would a different image change the reader’s perception of the news?

A photo of only Ofori-Atta might evoke sympathy or defensiveness, while one of only Agyebeng could highlight law enforcement’s pursuit. A courtroom scene would shift focus to justice and formality. By showing both figures together, this image strikes a balanced perspective without overt bias.

7. How does the image compare to others covering the same story?

This is a neutral but strong editorial composition. Other news outlets might use press conference shots, courtroom images, or Interpol-related visuals.
However, this side-by-side composition is more visually symbolic, inviting readers to think about the duality and conflict rather than just legality.

8. Is the image culturally or politically significant? (Does it reflect societal biases?)

Yes, culturally and politically significant, 

The image holds cultural and political significance, showcasing two prominent Ghanaian figures whose professional appearance and neutral expressions uphold public decorum. Though unbiased on the surface, interpretations of their body language may vary based on political or personal views.

Observation : This image essentially reflects the headline, highlighting the critical issue of improper mismanagement of state property, for which the individual which is Ken ofori Atta must be held accountable in accordance with the principles of a democratic republic.

#VisualStorytelling #IVS2025 #UniMACIFT