POWER FIRST : NETANYAHU EXTENDS GAZA WAR FOR POLITICAL GAIN

 

. 

 

Source : New York times news 

1. Does the image match the headline?

Yes. The headline talks about power and war decisions. This image shows Netanyahu sitting quietly, surrounded by others, but he is the only one lit up. That matches the story because it focuses on him, his choices, and the weight of his decisions.

2. What emotions does the image create?

The image feels serious, heavy, and a bit lonely. Netanyahu’s face looks thoughtful or even worried. The lighting makes him stand out, which gives the feeling that all eyes are on him, but at the same time, he seems isolated. It reflects pressure and responsibility.

3. Is the image manipulated or biased?

It doesn’t look edited, but the use of light and darkness is done very purposefully. He’s the only one fully visible, which makes him look like the main focus and the one to blame or judge. So, it’s not fake, but it is emotionally framed.

4. How does composition (lighting, framing) affect storytelling?

The strong spotlight on Netanyahu and the dark shadows around him create a feeling of power, tension, and solitude. The camera angle makes it seem like he's carrying a burden or being quietly judged. The other faces are blurred or hidden, which keeps the focus only on him.

5. Does the image add more meaning to the story or just repeat the headline?

It adds more meaning. While the headline talks about him prolonging war, the image shows the emotional cost or pressure he might be under. It shows a man who may look calm but is clearly in deep thought or trouble.

6. Would a different image change how people feel?

Yes If the image showed him giving a speech or smiling, he would seem confident and in control. If it showed people protesting him, the story would feel more angry. This photo makes readers think deeply and maybe feel concern or suspicion rather than anger.

7. How does this image compare to others covering this event?

Other images might show soldiers, Gaza destruction, or political meetings. This one focuses just on Netanyahu, making it more personal and emotional. It doesn’t show war, but shows the face of the man behind the decisions.

8. Is the image culturally or politically important?

Yes. Netanyahu is a key political figure in Israel. Showing him alone and in deep thought sends a message that his leadership is under the spotlight, especially when the country and the world are watching how he handles the war. It reflects political tension and public judgment.

This photo powerfully supports the headline. Netanyahu is the center of attention, literally and symbolically. The lighting and his expression suggest pressure, loneliness, and serious decision-making. It reminds readers that while war affects many people, one man’s choices can shape a nation’s path and that person is now under heavy scrutiny.

"POLICE OFFICER SUSPENDED AFTER BEATING JOURNALIST AT ABLEKUMA RERUN "

Source: PeacefmOnline 

1. Does the image match the headline?

Yes. The image uses bold, black text on a white background. It grabs attention immediately and reflects the serious and chaotic tone of the story. However, it does not show an actual scene from the event like the police, the attack, or the journalist so it represents the message in words, not visuals.

2. What emotions does the image create?

The strong headline creates feelings of shock, concern, and anger. Words like "brutal attack,” “chaos,” and “viral video” build a sense of urgency and wrongdoing, especially because a journalist was the victim.

3. Is the image manipulated or biased?

The image is not manipulated, but since it’s just text, it avoids showing either side visually. That makes it neutral in appearance, but the headline itself clearly places blame on the officer and highlights the violent nature of the act.

4. How does composition affect storytelling?

The bold and large font makes it feel like breaking news. The line spacing and capitalization emphasize key phrases like “Police Officer Interdicted” and “Brutal Attack on Journalist”. This gives it impact and clarity without needing photos.

5. Does the image add depth or just repeat the headline?

The image only reflects what is said in the headline, It doesn’t add visuals or emotional depth. A real photo of the scene, the journalist, or the protest would have made the story more powerful and real.

6. Would a different image change how people see the news?

It will surely change people's perspective. A photo or frame from the viral video would show how serious or violent the situation really was. It would give evidence and help people judge the scene themselves. Right now, we’re relying only on text.

7. How does the image compare to others covering the same story?

Other media outlets may use images from the video, showing the police officer or the injured journalist. Compared to those, this text-only image is less emotional and less direct—it doesn’t pull viewers in the same way.

8. Is the image culturally or politically significant?

Yes, the content of the headline is very politically and socially important. It involves press freedom, police misconduct, and election violence. These are big issues in Ghana and other democratic countries. However, the image itself does not directly reflect those tensions visually but rather announces them simply .

This headline image from Peacefmonline delivers a strong and urgent message using bold text, but it lacks the emotional or visual depth that a photo from the scene could provide. While it clearly presents the story’s seriousness, a real image would better connect viewers to the event and the people involved.

News story 

"REMEMBERING SREBRENICA: A WOUND THAT NEVER HEALS "

Source: New York Times News 

Thirty years after the massacre in Srebrenica, Bosnia, its painful effect still lingers. Over 8,000 Muslim men and boys were killed in July 1995 by Bosnian Serb forces, even though Srebrenica was supposed to be a safe zone under UN protection . Today, survivors and leaders across Europe remember the massacre and warn that its legacy has not faded.

European officials, including the President of the European Commission, recently spoke in strong words. They said that forgetting or denying what happened is wrong, and that Europe must teach future generations about Srebrenica  . On the anniversary, ceremonies and memorials were held in the town of Srebrenica and cities around Europe, to honor the victims and stress the importance of truth and justice.

A group called the Mothers of Srebrenica, made up of women whose husbands and children were killed, still leads efforts for justice  . They remind everyone that a mistake by the peacekeepers and failure to protect the town led to a tragedy that echoes through time.

Many mass graves have been discovered in the hills around Srebrenica, and the UN now recognizes what happened as genocide, the worst mass killing in Europe since World War II. Despite this, some deny it happened or call it false. Memorials stand surrounded by ongoing efforts to keep history alive and prevent future denial .

Countries involved, including the Netherlands, have apologized for failing to stop the massacre, and the UN has also admitted errors. These actions were steps toward responsibility, but many feel the work isn’t done .

Why It Matters Today? 

It matters because it is relevant in teaching history. Reminding people of Srebrenica helps block denial or forgetting. The massacre showed how dangerous prejudice can lead to genocide. Speaking openly about past crimes helps societies learn and heal. 

Even after 30 years, Srebrenica’s tragedy remains a powerful reminder: truth and memory matter—we must guard them to stop hate from taking hold again.

#ivs2025 #UniMACIFT #visualstorytelling